True Anarchism
by Nico Myowna
Anarchism is the theory of absence of mastery. The anarchism reject every rule, every goverment and every morality, who is found in an higher order, rules of myths, an religious profession or an universal theory, who claim that she is able to solve every problem or conflict now and in future; anarchism define freedom as absence of manipulation of the individuum through rules, religious or universal moralities, states, laws and governements. Human dignity saw the anarchism in the chance of everyone to use this freedom for sincere fulfilment and sincere actions against the state. This negative definition of anarchism and freedom express a fixed positive attitude of anarchists in front of reality and life.
If we reject universal or religious founded moralities and universal theories than we have to cultivate an open, anti-universal attitude. If we reject universal moralities than we could found our anarchist moralities only in ourself and our individual, relative experience. If we reject every theory who claim that she is able to solve every problem or conflict now or in future, than we couldn't have an fixed Utopia who should be realizable in our past, in present or in our future. We could logical be only Anti-Utopians who try to realize how the reality is and how this reality could be.
If we define freedom as absence of manipulation than we could
only fight for an asymptotic human reality who contain all
values, self-choiced mo-
ralities, ways of living, cultures, cults, ideologies and other
ways of thinking which people have established or be able to
establish, if they doesn't manipulate other human beings or deny
their human dignity -- equal, how paradox they are. If we define
freedom in an anarchist manner than everyone should be able
"to act without fear of social sanctions who influence the
to hit decisions." ('La sience moderne et l'anarchie' by
Peter Kropotkin, Paris 1913, page 161)
If we are as anarchists confronted with an asymptotic human reality who contain the opulence of human ways of living who are sometimes contrary and paradox than we are only able to guarantee the freedom for everyone if we radical attach to everybody his responsibility. But when we reject universal moralities than we can't establish an anarchist universal morality who bind everyone and give him a hint what his responsibility is. If we reject manipulations and if everybody should act without fear of social sanctions than we couldn't treaten someone with social sanctions to prevent crime and wrong decisions.
We can only solve conflicts if we say that the responsibility of everyone contain all free of fear of social sanctions hit decisions, self-choiced values, respective morality and way of living -- equal how wrong they are in our understanding. We can ask how sincere he in his respective decision or action is. If he is insincere than we would change his behaviour. If he believe that he is sincere than he have to acept our reaction: our freedom in front of everyone else is limited to make a decision about may we acept or not in every single case his action or decision.
We could only judge about the action or decision of someone and try to prevent this action directly if this action contain the risk to manipulate other persons or deny their human dignity; but if we judge about the use of freedom of an person for fulfilment, about his self-esteen and feeling of his own worth than we hurt the human dignity of this person; to call a person on this judgement a swine and influence others to believe that this person is a swine is an stigmatisation and discrimination of this person.
Nobody can betray our movement because we havn't an all comrades bounding morality. Our single moralities are based on the question only: How would we be treaten if we fail and hit a detasteful decision? -- And we should treaten others in this mutual way how they should treaten us in a comparable situation. Should everybody cry "Swine! Swine!" if we fail against the principles who based on our experience to fight against the state and their police only? Should everybody exclude us without a chance for rehabilitation? -- And could we really allow that our enimies -- the state, the nazis, the right-wing, the law -- dictate us our moral principles?!